Irish Natura and Hill Farmers Association publishes its Forestry Policy

Download The Full Policy HERE

The Irish Natura and Hill Farmers Association (INHFA) have today published its Forestry Policy. The policy is, they maintain a blueprint for how Ireland can overcome the current impasse in afforestation while achieving the three aims of increased carbon sequestration, greater biodiversity and improved water quality.

In discussing this INHFA Council Representative for Leitrim/West Cavan Patsy Daly stated “how this policy benefits the environment, farmers and our rural communities and is in stark contrast to the current Government policy on afforestation.”

When assessing current Government policy Daly was scathing on how this policy continues to incentivise investment companies in paying artificially inflated prices for agricultural land and then planting it with Sitka Spruce trees. Farmers are, he added, “unable to compete with these inflated prices, which has left many young farmers unable to get established and restricted existing farmers from expanding.”

With regard to the foreign investment companies, the INHFA representative questioned why we persist with a policy that supports them through Irish taxpayer’s money, to plant Sitka Spruce plantations, which kills biodiversity, pollutes our waterways while providing little or no carbon sequestration. “None of this makes sense and must be changed” he added.

In outlining the INHFA forestry policy Daly maintained how “we are proposing to turn all of this around, by incentivising farmers to plant a portion of their farms with native woodlands and commercial broadleaf trees.”

“Native woodlands and commercial broadleaves sequester carbon, they increase biodiversity and improve air and water quality. In addition to this, they provide quality of life benefits for local people as well as opportunities for woodland tourism” he stated.

Through this, we will, continued Daly, “see a policy shift from the vicious circle of anti-community, anti-environment and anti-farmer to a virtuous circle of forestry delivering social, economic and environmental benefits to the communities where they are situated.”
In seeking this change we must he stressed “ensure the delivery of a policy that:

• promotes native woodlands and native broadleaves ahead of Sitka Spruce,
• supports farmers and communities ahead of investment companies and vulture funds,
• sees trees as part of our farms and not replacing our farms,
• provides funding only to those that have owned and farmed the land for a minimum period of time.”

This, he concluded “is a policy we can support and one that farmers and communities will support, but critically it is a policy that delivers on carbon, biodiversity and water quality while enhancing rural communities.